Think Mass Shootings Are Terrorism? Careful What You Wish For
Jenkins, Brian Michael; Daddario, Richard C.http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/07/think-mass-shootings-are-terrorism-careful-what-you-wish-for-215797
Publisher: Politico Magazine
Date Written: 07/11/2017
Year Published: 2017
Resource Type: Article
In the United States there is no law enforcement or policy reason to apply the entirety of international terrorism law domestically. Doing so would not improve the ability to investigate, prosecute, or punish domestic terrorism, and it would come with unwanted consequences.
Excerpt: Redefining the domestic terrorism statute to encompass mass shootings as a form of terrorism on grounds that they create public terror, leaving aside individual motivation, would guarantee a continuing supply of public anger, especially if the audience is persuaded to substitute the more recent definition of a mass shooting as any armed assault that results in four casualties, including the shooter in place of the FBIs higher criteria of any shooting that results in four fatalities not including the shooter.This change alone transforms a comparatively rare event into an everyday occurrence.
Adding a material support provision to a new domestic terrorism law could theoretically expose the gun lobby as well as firearms manufacturers and sellers and even opponents of more stringent gun laws to criminal prosecution or civil suit on grounds that their activities support "gun terrorism." The nation needs to have a serious discussion about gun violence. A politically toxic debate about terrorism will not help.
© 2018. The information provided is copyright and may not be reproduced in any form or by any means (whether electronic, mechanical or photographic), or stored in an electronic retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher. The content may not be resold, republished, or redistributed. Indexing and search applications by Ulli Diemer and Chris DeFreitas.