Academics can change the world -- if they stop talking only to their peers
Publisher: The Conversation
Date Written: 08/03/2016
Year Published: 2016
Resource Type: Article
Heleta discusses the limited audience that academics publish for and the lack of real-world impact their ideas have as a result.
Research and creative thinking can change the world. This means that academics have enormous power. But, as academics Asit Biswas and Julian Kirchherr have warned, the overwhelming majority are not shaping today's public debates.
Instead, their work is largely sitting in academic journals that are read almost exclusively by their peers. Biswas and Kirchherr estimate that an average journal article is "read completely by no more than ten people". They write:
"Up to 1.5 million peer-reviewed articles are published annually. However, many are ignored even within scientific communities 82% of articles published in humanities [journals] are not even cited once."
This suggests that a lot of great thinking and many potentially world altering ideas are not getting into the public domain. Why, then, are academics not doing more to share their work with the broader public?
The answer appears to be threefold: a narrow idea of what academics should or shouldn't do; a lack of incentives from universities or governments; and a lack of training in the art of explaining complex concepts to a lay audience.
© 2019. The information provided is copyright and may not be reproduced in any form or by any means (whether electronic, mechanical or photographic), or stored in an electronic retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher. The content may not be resold, republished, or redistributed. Indexing and search applications by Ulli Diemer and Chris DeFreitas.