|
World-Class Scientist Calls Out Medical Journal For Smearing Lockdown Critics Instead Of Proving Them Wrong
Pullman, Joy http://thefederalist.com/2021/10/13/world-class-scientist-calls-out-medical-journal-for-smearing-lockdown-critics-instead-of-proving-them-wrong/
Publisher: The Federalist Date Written: 13/10/2021 Year Published: 2021 Resource Type: Article
A respected vaccine safety researchers says that scientific institutions are killing their own legitimacy by enabling and perpetrating lies, distortions, smears, and unwarranted hysteria about COVID-19. "Open and honest discourse is critical for science and public health. As scientists, we must now tragically acknowledge that 400 years of scientific enlightenment may be coming to an end," writes Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine at Harvard University and coauthor of the Great Barrington Declaration.
Abstract: -
Excerpt:
Collateral public health damage from Covid restrictions are real and enormous on cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, backsliding childhood vaccinations, starvation and mental health, just to name a few. It is not the GBD, but those who downplay lockdown harms who should be equated with those who question the harms of tobacco or climate change, Kulldorff explains in the article.
Lockdowns also stretch out disease outbreaks, forcing the vulnerable to protect themselves for a longer amount of time by delaying herd immunity, which increases deaths.
Kulldorff also discusses herd immunity. He says that accusing the Great Barrington Declaration coauthors of supporting herd immunity is akin to accusing someone of being in favour of gravity. Both are scientifically established phenomena. Every Covid strategy leads to herd immunity. The key is to minimise morbidity and mortality. The language, here, is non-scientific: herd immunity is not a creed. Its how pandemics end.
...
One smear he responds to is the idea that the 59,000 medical professional signatories of the declaration, who have thereby publicly opposed lockdowns, were critics of public health measures to curb Covid-19. On the contrary, Kulldorff writes, throughout the pandemic we have strongly advocated better public health measures to curb Covid-19 specifically protection of high-risk older people, with many clearly defined proposals. The failure to implement such measures, in our view, has led to many unnecessary Covid deaths.
Topics
|
AlterLinks
c/o Sources
© 2025.
|
|
|
|